Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Darius Khondji

When I looked up information about Darius Khondji, I realized I had already seen many of his movies: The Beach, The Interpreter, Se7en, and The Ninth Gate. Actually, these are all movies that were memorable to me in some way, and now I know the man responsible for that. I found a quote from him that says, “filmmaking is the orchestration of emotions through light.” Now that I reflect on these films, I see that this is true.

What I like most about Khondji’s cinematography in these films is his use of wide pans, light, and how he captures details. He lets the camera pan over the beautiful or exotic scenery like the tropical island in The Beach or the mysterious European mansions in The Ninth Gate. I also noticed that he is not afraid to place the camera at unique angles, to enhance the mood of a scene. Se7en is a great example of this, since the camera slowly moves over each horrible crime scene that the killer left behind, making the viewer feel as sick as the detectives who found it. Also, the close-up of Brad Pitt’s face at the end of Se7en is absolutely unforgettable, with the clear blue sky behind him, and his eyes swelling with tears and rage, right before he shoots the killer in the head. The long shots of Nicole Kidman running in The Interpreter are so sharp and full of detail, and so are the scenes filmed inside the giant auditoriums of the UN where her character works.

The depth of field (the front to back range of focus in an image) in some of his scenes is filled with detail, yet they appears clear and sharp. Some examples are the UN auditoriums, or the many library-room scenes in The Ninth Gate where, if viewers take their focus off Johnny Depp’s actions, they can probably see each book individually. Khondji doesn’t miss anything! He must have the eye of an eagle to make sure all these details are included.

Out of Order 2 Exhibition

I saw all the short nonlinear pieces from the Hunter Integrated Media Arts Program graduate students in Brooklyn at Monkey Town. These stories and documentaries were very short and used multiple screens that displayed information in unique ways.

The first video was an Interactive Installation, Untitled by Laurie Sumiye Filiak. The film shows a forest but when people walked by in front of the four sensors installed under the screen, the video image changed to the death of nature. This experimental work was easy to understand because it uses only two screens. Another film Untitled by Julie Mazo was extremely overwhelming. There were four screens on each wall and the people in the film were talking at the same time and were moving around from screen to screen. One girl was talking about consumerism, another one was speaking Spanglish, a choreographer was talking about African dance, and a police officer was talking about dead bodies. It was difficult to focus because they were talking at the same time. t.b.i. by Kathy Conkwright and Victoria Estok shows the life of a man with Traumatic Brain Injury after a plane crash. For me, it was very difficult to really concentrate on one screen only because there were four screens running at the same time and everything that he was saying in each screen was important.

Don’t tell anyone by Caro Montalvo talks about confessions of adultery. The audio was confusing because the viewer heard different voices talking at the same time about “cheating”, “double life”, “laughing”, “fighting”, “love” and “secrets”. The four videos on black screens show these words in white for few seconds and then they change to another word related to adultery. I tried to see everything at the same time but it was impossible because it was all moving too fast.

Smoke and Mirrors by Jennifer Jacobs is an amazing artistic animation created with a kind of Japanese anime style that uses a lot of details. on each one of the four screens there were showing different dolls taking off a kind of scarf that disappeared in front of the doll’s body. I think it was cute and the animation was very creative, but I felt like I could not fully appreciate them because there were four and they were moving so fast that I could not look long enough at any one of them.

The last film that I saw was Breve Espacio by Cristina Herrera, about “holding on to a lost memory.” This black and white video uses only 2 screens showing the same image and sound at the same time. One of the shots that she record showing the faucet dripping water just made me feel that sense of loss (beautiful shot, lighting, sharp and clean). As a viewer, I felt the grief that she talks about when she mentions that she is missing her father who is no longer with her.

Overall, I know that these projects were experimental, but I could only suggest that for the audience it will be easier to view the four screens in a place that shows the projection in a more comfortable space, like a planetarium. This way, viewers can appreciate the students’ work more, because they would be able to see the multiple screens together, instead of missing information becoming confused by looking from wall to wall. This is what happened to me when I looked at most of these projects, with the exception of Breve Espacio, and Laurie Sumiye Filiak’s Untitled.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Reflections on Our Class

Film and Media in a Digital Age Fall 2009 at Hunter College has been a magnificent experience because it would have been impossible for me to learn all of this information by myself. When I started this course I knew nothing about blogging, HTML, CSS and Photoshop, and then my knowledge of it has grown tremendously. I could never imagine having my own webpage; now I see myself in the stamp that I designed and in the blog that we built.
On the internet and even in the class we are so close to each other but so distant at the same time. Each one of us worked in the labs with Cristina and it was like dreaming because she retrieved each one of our blogs. It was exciting to see everybody’s work!
This blogging business has shown me that there are even more ways of expressing myself; in media reaching this point in technology it is as rewarding as it is scary. I realize that if we put our information on the internet, anybody can have access to it, and this can be positive, but also very dangerous. So, this has taught me to be more careful about what information I provide.
We posted clips of movies, music, our own photos and the stamp. The stamps made by students in the last lecture were very creative. I think all of us were having fun in the Digital Age class. We learned things that, in this age, are necessary because technology is improving so rapidly and is so important to our education and careers. So, this class was a very valuable experience for me.
I would also like to say that it could not be possible for me to transfer to HTML videos, sites and picture without the technical support of Mr. Rashaan; hopefully next semester we can have his presence in the Labs because he an expert and we can learn a lot from him.

And speaking of new technology- google The Onion News "Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop with No Keyboard"
It seems pretty silly to us now, but you never know what technology will come out next...

Saturday, December 5, 2009

“Design I like: Zeitgeist Movie Poster”









For more information about this film, go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeitgeist,_the_Movie


Poster Design:
Alignment tells people what image is important, by presenting it in a way that attracts the eye’s attention. In the case of this poster, all we see is the large letters of the title, and a large but partly shaded image of the world. Zeitgeist means the “spirit of the era” in German. So, if we see this word in large letters, and then see the world trapped in a cage, we may imagine that the “spirit” of the era is negative, or that the movie has a critical view of modern times. In this way, the alignment of the words and image gives viewers a hint about the ideas in the film.

The poster does not really make use of the grid system, but there is an actual grid present in the poster. The world is in a cell. This seems like a pun because a grid system in Media Design is meant to organize an image and make it appear harmonious to our minds. However, in this image, the grid is bent and placed around the Earth, trapping it in a cage. This creates a feeling of discomfort in viewers: it sends the message that humanity is caught in a prison. This relates to the idea of psychological constraint, because it makes people think about the limitations of freedom on Earth- which is actually a key theme in the film. Thus, it prepares people for what the film is about.

The font of the movie title may also be significant to the meaning of the film. The font is Courier New, and “as a monospaced font, it has recently found renewed use in the electronic world in situations where columns of characters must be consistently aligned” (Wikipedia). So it is possible that using this font for the title of the movie is a hint that people are being organized and controlled, as this font is used to organize things and keep them neat and easy to see.


By using this specific alignment and font, and by playing with the idea of the grid system, this poster reveals to viewers the meaning of the movie it is advertising.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Out At Work

“Out at work”

It is a documentary film from 1993 made by Tammy Gold and Kelly Anderson, two filmmakers and professors at Hunter College. The movie it is about discrimination, threats and abuse against lesbians and homosexuals in their work place. The film captures three people’s stories: Cheryl Summerville, cook at Cracker Barrel restaurant, Ron Woods an electrician worker at Chrysler automakers and Nat Keitt, a worker at the New York City Public Library. Cheryl was fired for her sexual orientation, Ron was protesting to support gays and lesbian rights and received threats from his coworkers, and Nat was prevented from including his partner, David under his health insurance plan as a spouse.


Fear: These two stills depicting the discrimination against homosexuals in the workplace, and the dangers they face.







It is amazing that workers who are trying to make a living have to face abuse because of their sexual orientation, which is something that has no affect on their job!







Cheryl hides inside a car because an angry mob is ready to attack her. This is a shot of a windshield and the sky.


Awareness: Gay Rights supporters raise awareness of injustice through protest and information sessions.




Woods talks about how to change the attitude at workplace to allow homosexual people to exist in peace like everyone else.





Activists are protesting against discrimination at work. One protests is outside Cracker Barrel restaurant that fired Cheryl, and another gay protest. These protestors are sometimes arrested for standing up for their rights.


Seeing the Filmmakers:






Professor Anderson, I see you!






Professor Gold, I see you, too!







This is a shot of Nat and his partner David celebrating Christmas together. The Filmmakers did a wonderful job showing viewers a loving relationship.
I think this shot is very artistic because in this frame David disappears in the left dark side but Nat’s silhouette is framed by the window-frame and backlight at the right. By the end of the film, Nat is still alive but David will die from AIDS. By capturing this scene of them celebrating together, the filmmakers show the most human side of both of them: they love and care for each other, and this makes viewers more sympathetic to their struggles.







Tammy Gold and Kelly Anderson clip of Nat and David’s Christmas dinner. This is one of the moments or shot when the filmmaker’s presence is suggested in the film. The filmmakers are rarely in front of the camera, but the two extra plates on the table suggest that Nat and David accept the filmmakers into their lives, and show appreciation.






Queer nation activist is recording the protest and an anti-homosexual protester punches his video camera. This shows how risky this profession can be. The filmmakers put their safety on the line in order to cover issues of discrimination and abuse.

CLICK IMAGE TO WATCH MOVIE



This is a clip from the Question and Answers session after the film at Hunter College on November 19 2009. Tammy Gold talks about the focus of the film. She comments that the film technology has greatly improved since the documentary was made in 1993 (digital format has been invented) but the protection against discrimination for homosexuals in the workplace has not really advanced as much.


For me, the people that the filmmakers chose to feature in the film are an inspiration. They struggle with fear and discrimination, but they keep fighting. Even though they are victims of society, they show the will to survive.
For Tammy Gold and Kelly Anderson, it is not just about making documentary films. This should be the purpose of a every documentary filmmaker: to show a problem or a situation in a humble way try to or help to ease the pain situation by making people aware of the problem. By erasing their ignorance and promoting sympathy, the film encourages positive change. People’s attitudes toward the problem will change, and this encourages positive results. That’s the biggest accomplishment of documentary filmmaking. The struggle is still on, but this film will a be historical record of the advances of human progress in history.