“Out at work”
It is a documentary film from 1993 made by Tammy Gold and Kelly Anderson, two filmmakers and professors at Hunter College. The movie it is about discrimination, threats and abuse against lesbians and homosexuals in their work place. The film captures three people’s stories: Cheryl Summerville, cook at Cracker Barrel restaurant, Ron Woods an electrician worker at Chrysler automakers and Nat Keitt, a worker at the New York City Public Library. Cheryl was fired for her sexual orientation, Ron was protesting to support gays and lesbian rights and received threats from his coworkers, and Nat was prevented from including his partner, David under his health insurance plan as a spouse.
Fear: These two stills depicting the discrimination against homosexuals in the workplace, and the dangers they face.
It is amazing that workers who are trying to make a living have to face abuse because of their sexual orientation, which is something that has no affect on their job!

Cheryl hides inside a car because an angry mob is ready to attack her. This is a shot of a windshield and the sky.
Awareness: Gay Rights supporters raise awareness of injustice through protest and information sessions.

Woods talks about how to change the attitude at workplace to allow homosexual people to exist in peace like everyone else.

Activists are protesting against discrimination at work. One protests is outside Cracker Barrel restaurant that fired Cheryl, and another gay protest. These protestors are sometimes arrested for standing up for their rights.
Seeing the Filmmakers:

Professor Anderson, I see you!

Professor Gold, I see you, too!

This is a shot of Nat and his partner David celebrating Christmas together. The Filmmakers did a wonderful job showing viewers a loving relationship.
I think this shot is very artistic because in this frame David disappears in the left dark side but Nat’s silhouette is framed by the window-frame and backlight at the right. By the end of the film, Nat is still alive but David will die from AIDS. By capturing this scene of them celebrating together, the filmmakers show the most human side of both of them: they love and care for each other, and this makes viewers more sympathetic to their struggles.

Tammy Gold and Kelly Anderson clip of Nat and David’s Christmas dinner. This is one of the moments or shot when the filmmaker’s presence is suggested in the film. The filmmakers are rarely in front of the camera, but the two extra plates on the table suggest that Nat and David accept the filmmakers into their lives, and show appreciation.

Queer nation activist is recording the protest and an anti-homosexual protester punches his video camera. This shows how risky this profession can be. The filmmakers put their safety on the line in order to cover issues of discrimination and abuse.
CLICK IMAGE TO WATCH MOVIE
This is a clip from the Question and Answers session after the film at Hunter College on November 19 2009. Tammy Gold talks about the focus of the film. She comments that the film technology has greatly improved since the documentary was made in 1993 (digital format has been invented) but the protection against discrimination for homosexuals in the workplace has not really advanced as much.
For me, the people that the filmmakers chose to feature in the film are an inspiration. They struggle with fear and discrimination, but they keep fighting. Even though they are victims of society, they show the will to survive.
For Tammy Gold and Kelly Anderson, it is not just about making documentary films. This should be the purpose of a every documentary filmmaker: to show a problem or a situation in a humble way try to or help to ease the pain situation by making people aware of the problem. By erasing their ignorance and promoting sympathy, the film encourages positive change. People’s attitudes toward the problem will change, and this encourages positive results. That’s the biggest accomplishment of documentary filmmaking. The struggle is still on, but this film will a be historical record of the advances of human progress in history.